sagawizard ([info]sagawizard) wrote,
@ 2008-08-26 17:05:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
DOWN WITH THE CULTURE WARS!
Ok, in a somewhat Jonathan Swiftian moment, I decided to write "the op-ed piece I could never actually send anywhere." Except the internet, of course. :)

Down with the Culture Wars!


By Sagawizard

I am so sick of the so-called "culture wars". Ever since the 2000 election it seems as if Americans, against all rational thought and self-interest, continue to base their political alignment around a key set of cultural issues around which they become unmovable. They attach to these pet topics like some demented Chihuahua on a raft clutches on a bone, not letting go even though the raft is sinking due to much, much larger reasons.

The American raft is sinking because of high-energy prices, environmental corrosion, soaring health care costs, inadequate schools and an otherwise wrecked economy. Everyone, North or South of the Mason Dixon line, on the coasts or in the heartlands, can agree with this. But the decisions that make them cast their votes? The questions we hear moderators pose to candidates? Abortion. Gay Marriage. Immigration. Gun control.

It boggles the mind, and, worse, it allows both parties to offer candidates that propose no good solutions to the big raft-sinking issues, because they know the only things that turn out the votes are the culture war issues. They stoke these fires because it lets them off the hook for having to actually do anything real.

I'm sick of it. So I'm proposing a platform for our next presidential candidate, of either party, to end this stupidity once and for all, issue by issue:

1. ABORTION/CHOICE: Outlaw abortion, keep birth control legal and subsidize to make it cheap enough for anyone to afford it. This quiets the pro-lifers and lets pro-choice women still control their reproductive functions.
As a corollary to the abortion ban, however, the country pledges to provide childcare (on a sliding scale, based on net work, up to 100%), and I mean everything, food, clothing, medicine, the works, including special needs for retarded and disabled kids.
Will this increase government spending? Hell's yes. It will be huge. There will have to be new taxes. But when people complain, remind the entire Bible Belt that "savin' babies" doesn't come cheap, and if this issue was really of such shattering, handed down from God importance to you, then put your money where your mouth is and REALLY "save" these kids. You don't like it, go back to the old system and shut up. And if women don’t want to have this many kids, at least they won’t be the ones paying for them.

2. GAY MARRIAGE: Abolish the State role in marriages, all marriages. Replace the marriage license with a "civil union license" in all states and make it available to any non-related couple above age 17 who wants to get "unioned." Unions get all the tax benefits and legal advantages/restrictions that marriage entailed. If you want to call it a "marriage", you've got to get a house of worship to sign on to it. There are more than enough religions and denominations out there that someone will likely do it.
If the religious folk have a problem with someone, somewhere calling two men or two women a married couple, then tough, take it up with that church or synagogue or Rastafarian-ganja-hut that authorized it. Leave the State out of it and let politicians get back to real work.

3. GUN CONTROL and DRUG LEGALIZATION: Two with one blow here. Legalize all guns, everything up to and including howitzers. Legalize all drugs, which then removes the #1 thing that people commit violent gun-crimes over.
Tax the hell out of all gun and drug sales, and use that money to fund the medical bills for the increase in people getting shot or suffering overdoses. Case closed.

4. IMMIGRATION: Anyone inside the US is now a citizen. Congratulations. From this moment onwards, no more immigration, period. If you cross the border illegally, you get shot on sight, Checkpoint Charlie style. Exceptions: really skilled workers with abilities America needs and political refugees. No one else. When and if the population rate falls below a certain rate, or when and if it becomes clear we're lacking a certain vital skill, we might open our borders again. Will this make America weaker or stronger? Will it mar our image as a country that takes in all who come? Maybe. But we've restricted immigration before, and I'm willing to have us do it again if it shuts up the people who are always whining about this issue and distracting us from more important ones.

5. MORE JESUS IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS, COURTS, GOVERNMENT, etc. This one's simple. Set forth a nationwide referendum, one-person one vote, throughout the country, on the question of making America into a Jesus-based nation. Put it all in writing: ten commandments everywhere, teaching intelligent design/creationism in the schools, Christmas pageants and manger scenes in front of all federal buildings. "Merry Christmas, not Happy Holidays." People of other religions have to convert or lose citizenship. All happy?
But here's the catch: you have to dismantle the entire Department of Defense, the Pentagon, the entire military. Trash all nuclear weapons, dry-dock all cruisers, beat all swords into plowshares. Because at every freaking turn of the Bible, Jesus calls for peace, goodwill to men, turning the other cheek, etc. You CANNOT build a nation based on Jesus that has an army. Costa Rica is an example of a nation that has no army, so it's not far-fetched. Get foreign defense treaties the way they do.
Oh, and Jesus talked all about how worldly wealth was not the way to go, and how it was easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to get into the kingdom of heaven, and how the meek shall inherit. So do a complete state takeover of all private property, Soviet-style, and make it all public.
Write a constitutional amendment than includes all of this, and then vote. And if the amendment doesn't pass, then all of those Jesus freaks are hypocrites because they just want the idols and the perks, and don't want to do the hard work Jesus asked of them, face the hard questions that got the Romans so freaked out that they crucified the man. If America is willing to put themselves through that kind of crucible, then heck, even as a Jew, I'd convert and play along. Otherwise, shut up and let us get to the real issues.


There. All we need is one president to just carry this all out, and then we can actually get to improving out country. By the time the next election comes, candidates would actually have to do real work.
Either that, or a new culture war would form around Coke vs. Pepsi.

-SW-



(Post a new comment)


[info]tonysalieri
2008-08-26 10:15 pm UTC (link)
Heh heh heh.

You cheeky bastard. :) I hope this thread gets some good comments.

(Reply to this)


[info]roboknee
2008-08-26 11:02 pm UTC (link)
I've been saying #2 for years. The government calls everything a civil union and churches are the only one that can bestow the title of marriage.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]tonysalieri
2008-08-27 12:39 am UTC (link)
I hate to say it...but I've never bought the "a repeat of separate by equal" argument presented by those who want to enforce the nomenclature of "marriage" on gay civil unions. If your rights are the exact same, coming from the exact same source (The State, in this case), then a rose is a rose is a rose, no matter what you call it. It just seems to me that a lot more folks would be more comfortable with the idea if you just stuck with the name "civil unions" for gay marriages. So why not?

Why not let folks get comfortable with the idea by calling it ONLY "civil unions" for a decade or so, and then slowly work it over. You'd actually achive 99% of your goal much quicker anyhow. It just seems like an extra bit of unneeded antagonism.

Maybe I'm just not getting something, here.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

I could live with... 50% of that
[info]saveferrets
2008-08-27 02:51 am UTC (link)
#1 - I'm not pro-choice, but I'm not an abortion-banner either. My unique take on Roe is that by extending protection to the unborn, states are extending rights of citizenship to non-citizens, and thus conferring citizenship upon non-citizens, as American citizenship is, constitutionally, usually achieved by birth (state) or naturalization (federal). So, in my version of this, you can ban abortion clinics in your town, much as you might decide to ban strip clubs (zoning!) but you can't actually ban people from having abortions.

As a practical benefit, we could (a) work hard to reduce births of people who are destined to suffer due to genetics, and (b) use this arrangement to push a pilot program to help match up unwanted kids with adoptive families who are unable to adopt due to a *shortage* of kids.

=====

#2. I've said this for years, and I go one step further. The government has no role in marriage. People should define their own contact. We wouldn't allow anything in it that's illegal (like slavery) but people pre-define what they want, and what they want to call it, for themselves, in a private contract. Part of it might be to get married in a Christian church, a pagan ritual, or by an Elvis impersonator in Vegas. Practical benefit: lots of work for all the lawyers, but less lawsuit work -- and fewer people getting into bad marriages, because they have to REALLY TRULY THINK ABOUT what marriage means to them and not conform to a societal standard.

#3. I don't dispute any of this, with the exception of drugs that ONLY make people violent, like PCP or meth. Hell, I'd even support legalizing drugs and taxing them to fund rehab clinics. Clean some people up, get rid of the crime, and stop exporting money. It's a win.

#4. No way in hell I give citizenship to people who cheated. Get in line like everyone else. The big thing is if you cannot prove you are a citizen, green card holder, or visa holder, you DO NOT GET ANY BENEFITS. I don't care that you're in the country illegally. I do care that you're not paying taxes, you're using benefits meant for our citizens, and you're taking a job away from our OWN underprivileged citizens. Also, if you are an illegal who commits a violent crime, you are arrested, deported, and BANNED FOR LIFE from the country. Regular illegals just go to the BACK OF THE LINE. I'll even go one further: I'd increase the immigration caps, but with the requirement that you work and you don't get a dollar of government assistance for the first 5 years you are in the country, legally and documented.

#5: I'm agnostic, so this doesn't really fly with me; I basically left Christianity due to inconsistencies and things I found morally flawed, such as the concept of original sin (As I will not accept responsibility for actions I did not do!!). Also, Jesus actually (allegedly) stated "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword." (Matthew 10:34). There's also: "But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one" (Luke 22:35-38), and several statements in all the Gospels that he in fact intends to pit families against themselves!

============
To me, the biggest problems are actually:

1) Social programs that are too expensive and that will either bankrupt us or double everyone's taxes;
2) Income taxes that are too high on working people to begin with;
3) A government that butts in and tries to tell me what to own (guns), eat (trans-fats), and everything else about life (speech codes, schools).
4) Eliminating corruption, graft, and patronage with militant force.

For (1) I would make everyone have to enroll in a national service program to receive any government benefits. You can be a flagman or a soldier or a community service worker, but you have to pay your dues -- no more "free stuff for nothing." For (2) I would eliminate income taxes under $100,000 for individuals and under $1,000,000 for sole-proprietorships and partnerships owned by private citizens (private ownership groups like Avaya or the Red Sox would NOT count). I would replace them with scaling consumption taxes. For example, when you register your car, you are taxed on your annual mileage at a rate commensurate with your car's MPG rating.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…